Introduction:
Emergence from anesthesia and the act of extubation often mark the final steps of a case, but they’re anything but “routine”. This phase demands just as much planning and precision in execution as induction and intubation.
Note: This post focuses specifically on adult surgical patients. While pediatric extubation has been more widely studied (with different considerations, particularly around laryngospasm), the principles here are aimed at adult airway management.
While extubation is generally expected at the end of most surgeries, it remains an elective step; it should only proceed once the patient's physiology, airway, and surgical context are all favorable. Facilitating these favorable conditions, and knowing when they’ve been achieved, is one of the primary responsibilities of the anesthesia provider.
However, the risks during this phase are real and well documented, ranging from minor physiologic responses to severe, life-threatening events.
Potential complications at extubation include:
Physiologic responses: Coughing, agitation, hypertension, tachycardia
Failure to tolerate extubation: Airway obstruction, hypoventilation, hypoxia, or inability to protect the airway
Difficulty re-establishing the airway: Anatomical challenges, physiologic deterioration, or limited airway access in an emergency
Choosing the right extubation strategy (awake or deep) may help mitigate some of these risks, but neither approach is without trade-offs. Ultimately, it falls on the anesthesia provider to exercise sound clinical judgment, tailoring their approach to each patient’s unique needs and circumstances.
Here are some practical considerations for each approach:
Playbook
Awake Extubation — The Foundational Approach
When to Choose Awake Extubation:
Most adult patients, most of the time.
Any patient at risk for:
Aspiration (e.g., full stomach, GERD, delayed gastric emptying)
Airway obstruction (e.g., severe obesity, obstructive sleep apnea)
Difficulty with ventilation or reintubation (e.g., neuromuscular disorders, airway edema, cervical spine precautions, known difficult airway)
Deep Extubation — A Selective Strategy
When to Consider Deep Extubation:
Low-risk patients with:
Easy mask ventilation and airway access
Low aspiration risk (e.g., fasting, no reflux or gastric issues)
Situations where minimizing airway stimulation is critical, such as:
Surgical cases sensitive to coughing or bucking (e.g., neurosurgery, ophthalmology, certain ENT procedures)
Patients prone to dangerous hemodynamic surges (e.g., severe coronary disease, aneurysm repairs)
Highly experienced provider, with a clear backup plan and resources immediately available.
Bottom Line:
Neither technique is risk-free. The core question every anesthesia provider must ask is: If something goes wrong, can I confidently ventilate and/or reintubate this patient? If the answer isn’t a clear 'yes,' awake extubation is the safer path.
Extended Commentary:
Evidence & Resources
This post is guided by two of the most detailed resources on this topic: the UpToDate review on extubation following anesthesia, and the Difficult Airway Society’s 2012 guidelines for tracheal extubation. For those interested in explicit algorithms and deeper technique discussions—such as airway exchange catheters, pharmacologic adjuncts, or the Bailey maneuver—those details fall beyond this post’s scope but are thoroughly covered in these references.
Beyond technical considerations, both sources also highlight a critical, often underappreciated reality: extubation-related complications are disproportionately responsible for severe airway-related outcomes, including hypoxic brain injury and death. This is yet another reason why extubation decisions deserve thoughtful attention and respect.
Awake Extubation - Why It Remains Foundational
Awake extubation maximizes safety because the patient has regained protective reflexes, airway tone, and the ability to breathe spontaneously and respond to commands. In high-risk patients, it’s often the only safe choice. And many of the typical concerns with awake extubation (e.g., coughing, bucking, hypertension) can often be minimized with smooth emergence techniques or pharmacologic blunting.
Deep Extubation - Rationale and Risks
Deep extubation reduces airway stimulation, leading to less coughing, bucking, and sympathetic activation. This can be desirable in cases where even brief physiologic surges could lead to complications, such as raised intracranial or intraocular pressure, or bleeding from delicate surgical sites.
However, deep extubation trades the airway security of an awake patient for a smoother physiologic emergence. The risk? Loss of airway tone and reflexes can easily result in upper airway obstruction, hypoventilation, or aspiration. It requires careful patient selection, skillful execution, and readiness for airway rescue.
Both of the resources cited above emphasize that deep extubation requires continuous anesthetic supervision until the patient is fully awake and able to maintain their own airway independently. Some providers may also choose to perform deep extubation early enough to allow the patient to emerge fully in the operating room before transfer to the next phase of care.
References
Parotto, M., & Ellard, L. (2024). Extubation following anesthesia. UpToDate. Retrieved July 3, 2025, from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/extubation-following-anesthesia
Popat, M., Mitchell, V., Dravid, R., Patel, A., Swampillai, C., & Higgs, A. (2012). Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia, 67(3), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07075.x
I’m never very convinced by the surgical arguments against coughing. If coughing is going to cause re-bleeding of surgical sites, perhaps the hemostasis was not adequate in the first place. Even if we extubate without coughing, what are the chances the patient will cough during their postoperative course? For surgeries like a thyroidectomy, does coughing actually increase local arterial and venous pressure at the site of surgery?
The hemodynamic arguments I buy more, but we have medications to treat hypertension.
On the flip side, if a patient is extubated deep, larygospasms, and has a bad outcome, how would one defend that in a legal case? It strikes me that deep extubation is something we do to give surgeons (and perhaps the patients?) a questionable benefit while bearing all the potential risk.